Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Should an injured worker apply for group health insurance benefits instead of Workers Compensation benefits?

0
Posted

Should an injured worker apply for group health insurance benefits instead of Workers Compensation benefits?

0

A. No. Often an employer will encourage their injured workers to apply for group health insurance benefits instead of Workers’ Compensation benefits. However, it is advisable not to apply for group insurance benefits for the following reasons: 1 Group health insurance policies frequently exclude the payment of any benefits for work-related injuries and therefore, might require the injured worker to indicate, in writing, that the benefits being provided are not a result of a work-related injury. Such an admission will turn up if there is a Hearing in the case and can jeopardize their Workers’ Compensation claim. Only use your group health insurance as a last resort.

0

No. Often an Employer will encourage their injured workers to use group health insurance benefits instead of Workers’ Compensation benefits. However, it is advisable not to apply for group heath insurance for the following reasons: First, most group health insurance policies do not provide for lost income or temporary total disability benefits (TTD) while you miss work due to the injury. Second, most group health insurance policies usually require that a worker pay a portion of the medial expenses, which is called a deductible or co-pay. This is often 10 to 20% of the medial bills incurred. Third and most importantly, group health insurance benefits frequently exclude the payment of any benefits for work injures, and therefore, might require the injured worker to indicate, in writing, that the benefits being provided are not a result of a work-related injury. Such an admission could jeopardize their Workers’ Compensation Claim. However, your group health insurance coverage can be used

0

A. No. Often an employer will encourage their injured workers to apply for group health insurance benefits instead of Workers’ Compensation benefits.

0

A. No. Often an employer will encourage their injured workers to apply for group health insurance benefits instead of Workers’ Compensation benefits. However, it is advisable not to apply for group insurance benefits for the following reasons: Most group health insurance policies do not provide for lost time or Temporary Total Disability benefits (T.T.D.). Most group health insurance policies usually require that the injured worker pay a portion of the medical expenses, whereas, Workers’ Compensation pays 100% of any injured worker’s reasonable and necessary medical expenses. The extensive rights and benefits an injured worker is entitled under the Act (T.T.D., P.P.D., rehabilitation, etc.) are not provided by group health insurance plans . Finally, and most importantly, group health insurance policies frequently exclude the payment of any benefits for work-related injuries and therefore, might require the injured worker to indicate, in writing, that the benefits being provided are not

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123