Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Should Administrative Law Judges Play A Greater Dispute Resolution Role?

0
Posted

Should Administrative Law Judges Play A Greater Dispute Resolution Role?

0

The ability of an administrative law judge (ALJ) to play a role in dispute resolution in administrative appeals has not been the subject of much public discussion, probably because it has not been generally recognized as an ALJ function. Parties to administrative disputes are thus generally unaware that ALJ’s can use prehearing conferences as a powerful tool for dispute resolution. Background Typically, administrative proceedings begin when someone is “aggrieved” by an agency action. Federal and state law require that first such claims be raised within the agency’s internal administrative review process before they may be brought in court. This process affords agencies an opportunity to reevaluate their decisions as well as a chance for all parties to consider alternative approaches to resolving their disputes. In Massachusetts, the Division of Administrative Law Appeals generally handles the appeals of agency decisions. But many agencies, including the Department of Environmental Prot

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123