Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Should a receptor evaluation be conducted for cases where there is a conditional No Further Action or Response Action Outcome subject to a Classification Exception Area (CEA)?

0
Posted

Should a receptor evaluation be conducted for cases where there is a conditional No Further Action or Response Action Outcome subject to a Classification Exception Area (CEA)?

0

For cases that have already received an NFA or RAO subject to a CEA, a receptor evaluation as described in N.J.A.C. 7:26E-1.15 is not required at this time. It should be noted that the biennial certification process for ground water CEAs includes an updated evaluation of potential receptors for vapor intrusion and ground water use. Refer to N.J.A.C. 7:26E-8.6(b)6 and 7:26E-8.3(b)iii for more specific details of the receptor evaluation associated with the biennial certification process. I am implementing a Remedial Action Work Plan (RAWP) that will involve a Classification Exception Area (CEA), but do not have a No Further Action (NFA) or Response Action Outcome (RAO) at this time. Do I need to complete an updated Receptor Evaluation form? If the case has yet to obtain an NFA or RAO and is in the Remedial Action phase, a Receptor Evaluation form is required. In this instance, the Receptor Evaluation form is required even if the only remaining work is monitoring for natural attenuation.

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123