Should a Citizen Accused of Domestic Abuse Lose the Right to Bear Arms?
suspension of his right to bear arms should be enforced and extended indefinitely. When someone is convicted of domestic abuse, a negative character trait may be assumed. The individual has a problem with anger management. When he or she loses their temper, they are unable to control their behaviour. They become like a wild beast, striking out at the perceived enemy with whatever weapons are at hand, whether it be hateful words, their fists, or the nearest heavy object with which they can inflict damage. It would be foolish to allow such an individual to have a gun or rifle within easy reach. You would, in effect, be issuing a probable death warrant to the object of his anger. In a fit of temper, the armed abuser may injure or kill other innocent victims: the children, the in-laws, neighbours, or innocent bystanders who step in to try to stop the carnage. Instead of one court case involving domestic abuse, the community may end up having to deal with a series of mass murders. Society o