Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

SEQUENCE OF INTRODUCTORY PHYSICAL GEOLOGY TOPICS: WHEN SHOULD PLATE TECTONICS BE TAUGHT?

0
Posted

SEQUENCE OF INTRODUCTORY PHYSICAL GEOLOGY TOPICS: WHEN SHOULD PLATE TECTONICS BE TAUGHT?

0

HIPPENSTEEL, Scott P., Department of Geography and Earth Sciences, Univ of North Carolina at Charlotte, 9201 University City Boulevard, Charlotte, NC 28223-0001, shippens@email.uncc.edu and SCHWIMMER, Reed A., Department of Geological and Marine Sciences, Rider Univ, 2083 Lawrenceville Rd, Lawrenceville, NJ 08648 Traditionally, physical geology courses and textbooks are organized so minerals are taught first, and plate tectonics covered toward the end of the course. With the recent emphasis on inquiry-based teaching, and on viewing Earth processes as an integrated global Earth system, is this “traditional” sequence still the preferred teaching method? Are publishers reorganizing textbooks to capitalize on the “recent” Earth-system trend? With the traditional sequence, plate tectonics acts as a capstone topic to explain how the previous subjects (e.g., volcanic activity) are related to the broader spectrum of Earth processes. It also allows the instructor to define, in detail, the causa

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123