Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Scientists tell me that if you can measure a radiation change with a meter, there is no change. Why should I believe EMF-Bioshield® works?

0
Posted

Scientists tell me that if you can measure a radiation change with a meter, there is no change. Why should I believe EMF-Bioshield® works?

0

There have been many examples of health impacts scientists could prove occur, but could neither explain nor measure. Society routinely uses solutions which lack perfect explanation or measurability. Aspirin has been in use for 80 years to relieve headaches while no one knew exactly how it worked. The reception centers in the brain on which it operates were only identified in the early 1980’s. In 1896, Henri Becquerel in France discovered the natural radioactivity of uranium salts. This discovery was questioned for decades by scientists who couldn’t measure anything with the instruments available to them. As a result, hundreds of French and Swiss watch factory workers died from mouth cancer because they would paint watch arms with radioactive phosphorous and lick their brushes to thin the tips. Many scientists refused to acknowledge a radiation risk existed until the Geiger Counter was invented in 1932, 36 years later… It may be decades before counterphase resonator effects are fully

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123