Scientifically speaking, whats the most persuasive evidence for reincarnation?
The work that Ian Stevenson and other researchers have done involving these cases of young children with spontaneous memories is by far the most persuasive. In Dr. Stevenson’s books, he has documented in meticulous detail the evidence that exists that could support a conclusion that the statements do represent actual memories from previous lives. Which cases seem most remarkable to you, or hardest to refute? The most convincing cases tend to involve young children, around the age of two to four, who begin making these statements, and they usually stop by the time they are six or seven. In the strongest cases, the children describe the lives of strangers who lived in another location, and those statements have then been verified to be accurate. In many cases, the children have birthmarks that match wounds on the bodies of the deceased, and these represent objective evidence of a link with the previous life. The cases of memories evoked through past-life regression are much less persuasi
Related Questions
- Our chapter members placed in Clinical Specialty and Researched Persuasive Speaking at the Regional level. Can they change their event before the state competition?
- Speaking strictly scientifically, are there valid arguments that mans impact on global warming is minor?
- What is the difference between transcription and translation scientifically speaking
