Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

SAN FRANCISCO 49ERS (2-2) Wasn Darrell Jackson supposed to be a number one receiver?

0
Posted

SAN FRANCISCO 49ERS (2-2) Wasn Darrell Jackson supposed to be a number one receiver?

0

I think so. They didn’t exactly give him Nate Clemons money (Clemens had his first INT with the Niners Sunday), but I’m quite sure that he got more than the going rate for someone who is averaging just 51 yards per game and hasn’t scored a touchdown yet. It’s not his fault that the passing game has been terrible, but the best thing for a young QB is to have a go-to guy. Jackson was brought in to be that guy, and so far, he hasn’t stepped up. Judging by Trent Dilfer’s performance Sunday against Seattle, if Alex smith is out for any extended period of time, the 49ers will have quite an early pick to address this need in April.

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123