Provisions of clause 7 and 7(a) appear similar. In what respect they differ?
Clause 7 provides for abatement in value @67.00% while clause 7(a) provides for @ 75.00%. Secondly, clause 7(a) is applicable in the cases wherein value of land is part of the value of services rendered. This condition has been provided for negatively. It means that inclusion of value of land in the total value of service is not required to be proved. As long as the SP is not recovering value of land separately abatement @75.00% will be applicable.
Related Questions
- When WiFi and other similar icons appear on the NavBar, the application name is truncated. Is this acceptable according to the current guidelines?
- How does this study differ from 2005’s Similar Students, Different Results: Why Do Some Schools Do Better?
- How does Spa for the Spirit differ from the ordinary day spa experience? In what ways is it similar?
