pm Sarah Palin can claim concern for her special needs child now that he is here and well, but how much concern did she show for him in utero?
How smart is it for a G5 of advanced maternal age to board a plane from Texas to Alaska with her waters broken and that same special needs child waiting to be born? I agree with the concern over genetic marking also. The human genome project is advanced enough now to identify some genetic predispositions (like ALS) and that information should be protected from insurance companies who would deny coverage. Pre-existing conditions in a newborn should NEVER be used as a means to disqualify someone for coverage. Reply Kathy said August 14, 2009 at 6:50 am Scorpiosity, I think Sarah Palin showed great concern for her child, in that she went to a place where she was comfortable, so she could be with her care-givers she had chosen, and give birth in the place of her choice. You act like water breaking is a death sentence for the baby if the woman does not enter the hospital within half an hour, which is ridiculous and over the top. The thing that gets me about most anti-Palin people (you may b
Related Questions
- What level of detail will be required as medical justification on the attachment to the claim for treatment of the child and the family therapy?
- pm Sarah Palin can claim concern for her special needs child now that he is here and well, but how much concern did she show for him in utero?
- Who does the national enquirer claim that sarah palin had an affair with?
