Please provide us a complete comparison of the two types of furnaces especially in the areas such as technical performance, capital costs and operational costs?
Yes, Rotary furnace is quite feasible, efficient & versatile to use as compare to Blast Furnace. The salient features for both the Furnaces are as follows. : • Blast Furnace is Coal-fired which combines the features of low set-up and operating costs, high process efficiency, low maintenance requirements due to no moving parts and user-friendly features. Blast Furnace can be run in shifts since starting and shut down of furnace is not much costly. This process must require wood charcoal of good quality since charcoal acts as heating media as well as reducing agent for charge material. • Rotary Furnace is oil fired and display good operating/efficiency characteristics. The fuel required for burner to heat furnace is F.O. / L.D.O. or any other equivalent burning media / oil. Since charcoal or coal is required only as reducing agent hence lower grade of charcoal / coal can also be used. Rotary furnace will be used for continuous production in Batch process. For setting up this type of plan
Related Questions
- Please provide us a complete comparison of the two types of furnaces especially in the areas such as technical performance, capital costs and operational costs?
- How has Norway used its countrys wealth to benefit the population at large, especially in the areas of health, education and culture?
- Are there team technical areas on every field?
