Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Please explain the Phizackerley case and why the Special Commissioners and the Revenue did not accept the nil-rate discretionary trust in this case?

0
Posted

Please explain the Phizackerley case and why the Special Commissioners and the Revenue did not accept the nil-rate discretionary trust in this case?

0

Warburton: Dr Phizackerley and Mrs Phizackerley were a married couple. Mrs Phizackerley had never worked. Dr Phizackerley provided all the funds for the purchase of the house. The house was purchased in joint names so Dr Phizackerley made a gift to Mrs Phizackerley at the time of purchase. At the time of drafting their wills, they severed their joint tenancy and became tenants in common, so allowing the half-share to pass under the wills. Mrs Phizackerley died, leaving £150,000 to a discretionary trust and the residue absolutely to Dr Phizackerley. The value of her estate on death was only £210,000. Her executors assented her property (share of the house) to her surviving husband absolutely who gave an IOU for £150,000 to the trustees of the DT. Dr Phizackerley subsequently died. His executors claimed a deduction for the debt of £150,000 (plus indexation) which was refused by HMRC. The reason for the refusal was anti-avoidance provisions in s103 FA 1986. The debt had been incurred by D

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123