On the T1.5 interface, what is the difference between AT&Ts Extended Superframe Facility Data Link (ESF FDL) protocol and the ANSI version?
AT&T created and implemented the first ESF FDL protocol named after the defining Technical Reference, TR54016. The AT&T protocol uses a command/response arrangement with the Customer Installation (CI) such as an ESF CSU, Multiplexer or PBX. ANSI defines the ESF FDL protocol in their DS-1 specification, T1.403. The ANSI protocol requires the CI to generate Performance Report Messages (PRMs) at one-second intervals. The advantage of ANSI T1.403 over AT&T TR54016 is the monitoring equipment in the network can be non-intrusive, increasing circuit reliability. TR54016 and ANSI T1.403 conform to ITU Q.921 and can coexist on the same 4Kb/s ESF FDL. AT&T supports equipment conforming to both TR54016 and ANSI T1.403. It is recommended that new CI support both TR54016 and ANSI T1.403.
Related Questions
- On the T1.5 interface, what is the difference between AT&Ts Extended Superframe Facility Data Link (ESF FDL) protocol and the ANSI version?
- Does HostBridge return Data to TIBCO in XML format when using the LINK/ECI interface?
- In T1, what is the difference between superframe (SF)/D4 and extended superframe (ESF)?