Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Olympic Pipeline says there are alternatives to water-pressure testing that work just as well, cost less, and do not involve using large amounts of water. Why not accept those methods?

0
Posted

Olympic Pipeline says there are alternatives to water-pressure testing that work just as well, cost less, and do not involve using large amounts of water. Why not accept those methods?

0

Olympic prefers to run internal “smart pigs” instead of performing water-pressure testing. A new experimental tool (Transverse Field Inspection – TFI) was run through the Seattle Lateral last May. It identified 131 potential seam weld defects. Olympic plans to inspect only 14 of these potential defects in the next three years. There is too much uncertainty with this new experimental tool. The only way to ensure that this pipeline can withstand the pressure of its operation is to fill it up with water, and pressurize it.

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123