Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Of course it stems from a truism: debating the validity of faith and religion in general can only go so far–once a person says ‘I believe’ you have to say ok…right?

0
10 Posted

Of course it stems from a truism: debating the validity of faith and religion in general can only go so far–once a person says ‘I believe’ you have to say ok…right?

0
10

When Richard Dawkins book, The God Delusion, flew off of bookstore shelves I was so happy. I thought “we finally live in a world where religious hypocrisy can be discussed, openly. Where inconsistencies–the kind that led me to stray from my Christian upbringing–could be banished as non-facts.” But the God Delusion did more than that. It inadvertently branded people–specifically Atheists–as rude, mean spirited and arrogant. It deemed all religious people–delusional, ignorant, and mentally weak. When I speak with my evangelical friends, I tread carefully through our conversations. Fear doesn’t provoke it; a love of knowledge, friendship, and a love of truth makes me watch my tongue. If I want to see the relationship between freethinkers and the faithful change, I have to bring warmth before I deliver cold. When I was a ‘new Atheist’, there was no stopping me. My blood wanted a fight, and logic was on my side. I’d say it just the way I felt it, which was usually pointed toward the hypocri

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123