NFC normalization requires large tables, right?
Like many other cases, there is a tradeoff between size and performance. You can use very small tables, at some cost in performance. (Even there, the actual performance cost depends on how often normalization needs to be invoked, as discussed above.) To see an analysis of the situation, see Normalization Footprint. It is a bit out of date, but gives a sense of the magnitude. For comparison, ICU’s optimized tables for NFC take 44 kB (UTF-16) and Google’s optimized tables for NFC take 46 kB (UTF-8).
Related Questions
- These considerations are right. How can, a small software house put into troubles large corporations like Microsoft, Intel, IBM, Hewlett Packard, etc.?
- Are they accepted at Am.... er, the Very Large Online Retailer that requires them?
- I have a large wheel base SidexSide. What ramp system is right for me?
