My linked spreadsheets seem to work just fine, what advantage would CAFR-2000 have?
One of the most common comments we get from our users is that when they go to parallel the prior year’s data they quite often can’t reproduce the exact results that they published in their last CAFR. The reason for this is usually because at the last minute they make some change and just ‘plug’ the numbers, if you use CAFR-2000 you would have to go out of your way to by-pass the system, otherwise a complete trail & history is in the system to show how all of your numbers were derived.
