Must the agency restart the 90-day clock if the original comparable replacement dwelling has been sold?
No. The 90-day time period continues to run without interruption. However, if the original comparable dwelling is no longer available, the agency must assure itself that equally comparable dwellings are still available in the same price range. If the agency finds it necessary to initiate eviction actions, its records must contain sufficient documentation to confirm that a comparable replacement dwelling is available for occupancy. 48. ยง24.204. Can the agency reduce the relocation payment offer if, after 90 days have passed, the displaced person has not acquired replacement housing and the agency locates another comparable dwelling that is available for less than the comparable used for the offer? Yes. If the displaced person has made little or no effort to acquire a replacement dwelling, it would be permissible, after a reasonable period of time, to reduce the offer if a less-expensive, comparable dwelling becomes available. If an agency elects to lower a payment offer, it should docum
Related Questions
- Can the agency limit the reimbursement for all incidental expenses to those that would have been incurred incident to the purchase of a comparable replacement dwelling?
- How does the change in part of the definition of comparable replacement dwelling change the treatment of "less than 90-day occupants" or "subsequent occupants"?
- Must the agency restart the 90-day clock if the original comparable replacement dwelling has been sold?
