Mr ACTING-SPEAKER (Mr John Mills): Is this a different point of order?
Mr Brad Hazzard: It certainly is. If the Minister wants to attack the character of the honourable member for Epping, or any member, Standing Order No. 82 specifically requires him to draft and present a substantive motion about an assessment of the member’s character. This motion calls on the Leader of the Opposition to do something and on the honourable member for Epping to apologise. It is not a substantive motion that allows an attack on the character of the honourable member for Epping. The Minister should be ruled out of order and told to sit down. I invite you to read the motion— Mr ACTING-SPEAKER (Mr John Mills): Order! I do not accept what the honourable member for Wakehurst says is correct in relation to the motion moved by the Attorney General. Therefore, there is no point of order under Standing Order No. 82. Mr Brad Hazzard: Are you saying that it fits within Standing Order No. 82? Mr ACTING-SPEAKER (Mr John Mills): Order! I have given my ruling. The Attorney General has th
