Might OPS consider revising the rule, if experience indicates that longer reassessment intervals could be acceptable?
OPS does not envision changes or exceptions to the required reassessment intervals. Section 192.913 describes the criteria by which an operator demonstrating exceptional performance can qualify for performance-based approach. Such an approach is available to operators with mature integrity management programs who have conducted at least 2 assessments on covered segments that they intend to include in the performance-based approach. Operators implementing a performance-based approach can deviate from the inspection intervals specified in the rule, as provided in 192.913(c). • FAQ-207. Table 3 of ASME/ANSI B31.8S indicates that reassessment intervals must be 5 years for some instances in which test pressure was higher than would be required by Subpart J. If I conduct my assessments in accordance with Subpart J, must I reassess more frequently than once every seven years? [05/03/2006]Answer: Section 192.939(a)(1) specifies requirements for establishing reassessment intervals. Two options
Related Questions
- Might OPS consider revising the rule, if experience indicates that longer reassessment intervals could be acceptable?
- If SAE changes a specification, are products tested under the older version no longer acceptable?
- Are high intensity intervals or longer periods of low intensity cardio better for fat loss?
