Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

May a seller mark an order “long” if the seller owns the security pursuant to Rule 200(b) but is not “net long” in the security?

0
Posted

May a seller mark an order “long” if the seller owns the security pursuant to Rule 200(b) but is not “net long” in the security?

0

Rule 200(c) provides that a person shall be deemed to “own” securities only to the extent that the person has a “net long” position in such securities. Therefore, a seller must be net long in a security in order to mark “long” an order for that security. Rule 200(c) does not change the “net long” requirement of former Rule 3b-3. (NEW!

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123