Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Ive tried using computers on stage, but plugins take forever to load. Is Receptor any better?

0
Posted

Ive tried using computers on stage, but plugins take forever to load. Is Receptor any better?

0

Absolutely. Muse Research employees hate waiting for plugins to load just like everyone else. For this reason, we’ve created some clever techniques to reduce or eliminate the long patch-loading times associated with plugin-based instruments. Our unique Z-load technology can drastically reduce the amount of time required to instantiate a plugin. If instantaneous switching is required, Receptor owners can load up all 16 of Receptor’s instrument channels with different plugins, then save different bypass states as patchesswitching between patches then switches plugin bypass settings without causing the plugin to load. This is called a “Performance Multi.” Samplers, however, are particularly ornery, in that they even want to load and unload their sample data whenever the plugin is bypassedso Muse Research created “snapshots”, which allow you to load all your samples into your samplers, then switch between them without having the samples reload. Receptor is built with the stage performer in

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123