Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

It is equivalent to many statements which are not intuitive such as “Every set can be well ordered.” How, for example, would you well order the reals?

0
Posted

It is equivalent to many statements which are not intuitive such as “Every set can be well ordered.” How, for example, would you well order the reals?

0

• With it you can derive non-intuitive results, such as the existence of a discontinuous additive function, the existence of a non-measurable set of reals, and the Banach-Tarski Paradox (see the next section of the sci.math FAQ). • It is nonconstructive – it conjures up a set without providing any sort of procedure for its construction.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123