Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

It appears the Slony-I xxid functions are claiming to be capable of hashing, but cannot actually do so. Whats up?

0
Posted

It appears the Slony-I xxid functions are claiming to be capable of hashing, but cannot actually do so. Whats up?

0

Slony-I defined an XXID data type and operators on that type in order to allow manipulation of transaction IDs that are used to group together updates that are associated with the same transaction. Operators were not available for PostgreSQL 7.3 and earlier versions; in order to support version 7.3, custom functions had to be added. The = operator was marked as supporting hashing, but for that to work properly, the join operator must appear in a hash index operator class. That was not defined, and as a result, queries (like the one above) that decide to use hash joins will fail.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123