Isnt the Standard Model based on the Higgs mechanism, not just the Dirac equations?
Yes and that is why we can say that the SM denies the fundamentaliy of Dirac equaitons. My article is clearly based on the fundamentality of Dirac equations while the Standard Model implies that the Dirac equations are not completely fundamental equations to determine the properties of fermions, but it requires some other explanation of Higgs field. If that is where the SM stands at, then it should Cleary state that “the Dirac equation is not fundamental, but the Higgs mechanism is more fundamental one”, but no where in the SM makes such a clear statement. Also, our practical understanding of fermion is mainly based on the fundamentality of the Dirac equations. At least, the Dirac equation is still commonly accepted as fundamental in most references we can find including textbooks. If we would like to deny the Dirac equations, we need a more cautious approach then the way the Higgs mechanism has been upheld so far. After all, the Higgs mechanism has not been verified yet and is still h
Related Questions
- How does the Schroth Based Method interface with the current standard of care for idiopathic adolescent scoliosis in the United States?
- Does Warehouse Builder have a published metadata model with SQL based query capability and/or an Application Program Interface (API)?
- How can I manage the models organization of equations for better manageability and clarity?
