Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Isn’t it better that we sacrifice the oceans and let them keep on taking up CO2 and buffering climate?

0
Posted

Isn’t it better that we sacrifice the oceans and let them keep on taking up CO2 and buffering climate?

0

Ocean acidification and climate change are two sides of the same coin. Both are direct consequences of anthropogenic CO2 emissions and cannot be separated from each other. The present uptake of about one quarter of anthropogenic CO2 emissions by the ocean indeed serves as a buffer against rising atmospheric CO2, and so this “service” could be considered to diminish, but not prevent, climate change. In the long term, on time scales of tens of thousands of years, the majority of anthropogenic CO2 emissions (80-90%) will end up in the ocean. This, however, will not protect the climate system from global warming during the intervening period. It is also important to point out that the impacts of CO2 uptake by the oceans will have profound effects on the functioning of Earth’s ecosystems. The oceans provide vital roles in biogeochemical cycles—not only in the regulation of CO2, but in the production of oxygen, the cycling of nitrogen and other important nutrients, as well as the productio

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123