Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Isn’t it always better to have no agents?

agents isn’t
0
Posted

Isn’t it always better to have no agents?

0

Not really. The Agent model offers a number of outstanding benefits which are simply not available in any other way. These include: • Reporting to multiple Managers • Granular at-the-source filtering • SID translation • Performance threshold monitoring • Detection of install/uninstall of software • Service monitoring • Native log backup • Runaway process detection • Network traffic monitoring • Monitoring of application logs On the other hand, agents must be deployed, configured and do take up some computing resources. You should decide based on your business requirements as opposed to accepting a single one-sized fits-all approach.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123