Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Is working with Raw Feed a little less restrictive than the average horror film environment?

0
Posted

Is working with Raw Feed a little less restrictive than the average horror film environment?

0

Shawn Papazian: Warner Brothers has been fantastic. We were really given the reigns on this one. They allowed us the ability to play more. We didn’t just throw it down the middle. I really wanted to put an artistic twist and twang to my version of Rest Stop: Don’t Look Back. The producers were very open to it. They were open to me shooting it in the 2.35:1 aspect ratio. We wanted to give it a cinematic feel. You don’t really see that in a lot of horror movies. We really wanted to get in that The Twilight Zone type flare. If this were a theatrical release, we would have had to hone in on one certain aspect, and made the film more specific. Going with this fairly new medium gave us the opportunity to really open our wings. We were able to play with other genres, and tie in other pieces of cinema. It was very refreshing, and very free. It really struck me that the victims from the first movie came back as ghosts, here. I’ve never seen that in a slasher movie before. How did you guys come

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123