Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Is William Gibsons Neuromancer too vast for the big screen?

0
Posted

Is William Gibsons Neuromancer too vast for the big screen?

0

| Week in geek 14 May 2010 8:53 AM, PDT | The Guardian – Film News | See recent The Guardian – Film News news » Vincenzo Natali thinks not – and the director who gave us the cult sci-fi brainteaser Cube is determined to prove it “If it can be imagined, it can be filmed,” is a quote often attributed to Stanley Kubrick. In recent years, film-makers have proved him both right and wrong. Last year, I felt Zack Snyder made a more than decent bash of bringing the dense and multi-stranded Watchmen to the big screen, while in the past decade we’ve even seen The Lord of the Rings, once considered too long and flowery for Hollywood, turned into a blockbuster trilogy by Peter Jackson. On the other hand, critical reaction to Tom Tykwer’s 2006 adaptation of the decidedly unfilmic Perfume: The Story of a Murderer was pretty mixed, and neither Joseph Strick’s 1967 attempt, nor Sean Walsh’s Bloom in 2004 really got under the skin of James Joyce’s Ulysses, surely the ultimate unfilmable novel.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123