Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Is urinary tract cytology still useful for diagnosis of bladder carcinomas?

0
Posted

Is urinary tract cytology still useful for diagnosis of bladder carcinomas?

0

Garbar C; Mascaux C; Wespes E Department of Pathology, AZ-VUB, Free University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium. christian.garbar@az.vub.ac.be BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to estimate the efficiency of a recent five-category urinary cytological classification. METHODS: A total of 592 bladder washings were fixed immediately with Saccomanno’s fixative. All samples were centrifuged in a Hettich cyto-centrifuge. For each sample, the reference standard was the histology when a lesion was present at the time of cystoscopy. A five-category cytological classification was used: negative, suspicious of low (S-Lg) or high (S-Hg) grade neoplasia and consistent with low (Lg) or high (Hg) grade neoplasia. RESULTS: For cytological diagnoses of S-Lg and Lg, sensitivity was 37% and specificity was 95% for the histological diagnosis of low-grade non-invasive urothelial papillary tumour (Lg-UPT), which included papillary urothelial neoplasm of low malignant potential and low-grade urothelial carci

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123