Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Is urethral catheterization a successful alternative to suprapubic aspiration in neonates?

April 26, 2017alternative aspiration catheterization neonates successful suprapubic urethral

0

Posted

Is urethral catheterization a successful alternative to suprapubic aspiration in neonates?

1 Answer

0

Posted

OBJECTIVE: To compare urine collection by urethral catheterization with suprapubic aspiration in a neonatal intensive care unit. METHODOLOGY: All urine collections were documented, the collection methods attempted recorded and success rates calculated. The incidence of contaminated specimens was determined. The infants ranged in weight from 570 g to 4180 g and in gestation from 24 to 44 weeks. RESULTS: Thirty-two out of 65 (49%) suprapubic aspirations were successful. Overall 33/42 (77%) of catheterizations were successful, 12/18 (67%) were successful when following an unsuccessful SPA. No SPA was contaminated compared to 7/22 (22%) of the catheter specimens. Urinary tract infection was present in 4/63 (6.3%) infants. There were no complications following catheterization. CONCLUSIONS: Urethral catheterization is a useful and safe alternative to suprapubic aspiration, but suprapubic aspiration remains the method of first choice.