Is two sets of 12 correct responses a stringent requirement?
Yes. Richard Clark intentionally made the requirements strict because with thousands of people taking the test, even random guessing would eventually cause someone to pass the test if the bar was set low. Since he is offering his own $10,000 to anyone who will pass the test, he wants to protect against the possibility of losing it to random guessing. However, if the listener is willing to put up their own money for the test as a bet, he will lower the requirements from 12 correct down to as low as 6 correct. Richard Clark has said 22 out of 24 would be statistically significant. In fact it would prove that the results were audible. Any AVERAGE score more than 65% would do so. But no one has even done that.
Related Questions
- If a PHA believes that a Field Offices requirements are more stringent than a regulation, what are the procedures for challenging the requirement?
- Are Classics, History or Philosophy university level courses equivalent to the English pre-professional requirement?
- Is there a minimum balance requirement for an ANZ Term Deposit?
