Is tree planting really valid for carbon sequestration?
A legitimate question. ” every=”” person=”” on=”” this=”” earth=”” has=”” the=”” capacity=”” to=”” greatly=”” reduce=”” their=”” own=”” personal=”” impact,=”” while=”” also=”” significantly=”” affect=”” global=”” climate=”” change.=”” we=”” as=”” americans=”” produce=”” approximately=”” 20=”” tons=”” co2=”” per=”” capita.=”” compare=”” a=”” world=”” capita=”” value=”” of=”” just=”” 4=”” annually,=”” and=”” you=”” can=”” see=”” that=”” are=”” responsible=”” for=”” majority=”” worlds=”” carbon=”” emissions.=”” good=”” news=”” is,=”” individuals,=”” families,=”” businesses,=”” etc.=”” have=”” it=”” within=”” our=”” power=”” great=””> With the rapidly growing awareness of the causes and effects of global warming, a number of schemes have been promoted that purport to either take carbon out of the atmosphere or prevent it from going there in the first place. Prominent among these is tree planting. The logic is that a growing tree takes carbon from the air and incorporates it into wood, Howe
