Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Is this news article correct in the statement that North Korea actually possesses nuclear weapons (two) in 2009?

0
Posted

Is this news article correct in the statement that North Korea actually possesses nuclear weapons (two) in 2009?

0

North Korea ran what it claimed were two nuclear tests, I think in 2009. The first was so small that it could have been a misfire (essentially, a failed test) or simulated with conventional explosives. The second was larger, so it would have been difficult (but not impossible) to simulate. The expected traces of radioactive gasses were not detected. Assuming that these were genuine nuclear explosions, it is plausible that they have enough nuclear material for another one or two bombs. At this stage, they would still be “bench test” bombs. Converting them into something that could be dropped by a huge bomber such as a B29 would be easy. Fitting them into, for example, a missile would be harder, and they may not have done that yet – though they have been working on it. So two clumsy bombs would be a reasonable best guess of the current state or their nuclear arsenal.

0

It is true that North Korea does posses them, they have tested nuclear weapons numerous times already along with some mostly failed long range missile tests.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123