Is this a reaction to staid, unengaging live electronic performance?
Each to his/her own with regards to how they decide to perform music, but I think that people not only pay to hear the music but also want to see a performance. Personally, it would make things infinitely simpler to waltz on stage with a laptop but I would be too ashamed to even look at the crowd. I inevitably make mistakes with the live set-up, but at least the audience can see and hopefully appreciate what I’m trying to do… From your experiences thus far, what do you feel is the most amount of instruments you can physically incorporate into your live set-up? To be honest, I work to the constraint that I only have an 8 channel mixing desk at present, which is used to channel all the instruments into the looping pedal. As much as I would love to incorporate more instruments into the set having this ‘limit’ gives me a boundary to work to. The live set up includes drums/cello/Spanish guitar/recorder/xylophone and kantele (traditional Finnish harp) but I also use a sampler to play the p
Related Questions
- Solar Light has optimum performance during sunny summers. However, if I live in a place that is always rainy, cloudy or even has harsh winter with little sunlight, does the Solar light suit me?
- Where can I watch a live professional performance of Hamlet in its original style as written by Shakespeare?
- Is it possible to meet with Julie or to hear a live performance of Ensemble Elan?
