Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Is there really an advantage to using de-emphasis followed by outboard analog re-emphasis?

0
Posted

Is there really an advantage to using de-emphasis followed by outboard analog re-emphasis?

0

This is really a mixed bag… Our processing inevitably produces some amount of intermodulation distortion, or IMD. We go to great lengths to minimize this, but as we are frequently behaving as a nonlinear compressor in each of the Bark bands, it is inevitable. Using an outboard equalizer to re-emphasize our de-emphasized boosts affects not only the desired freqeuency boosts but also the inadvertant IMD products. IMD products are found both above and below the signal frequency of a strong carrier. The outboard equalization is generally a high-shelving boost, so those IMD products above the band will be boosted higher. If we did not perform de-emphasis and did not use outboard re-emphasis equalizers, then these IMD products would not receive any extra boost. That could be a good thing, especially if these IMD products are near audible thresholds. But, not performing de-emphasis inside the System 5000 means that in some cases of severe hearing corrections, we will have to use up as much

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123