Is there any way that I might form an output file which lists only the sum of residuals and maximum fractional error for each test run?
There is no way with version 1 of PHREEQC to write inverse-modeling information to another file. The beta test version 2.0 has the capability to write the mole transfers to a selected-output file. I’ll have to add the maximum fractional error and sum of residuals to this output. (http://wwwbrr.cr.usgs.gov/projects/GWC_coupled/phreeqc). • INVERSE MODELING: If I specify a list of minerals without using the minimal identifier, does this mean that the model will use every mineral given and try to equilibrate these? The inverse modeling does not do ANY equilibration, it is purely an exercise in accounting for moles of elements. If you do not put in -minimal, the program attempts to find every combination of minerals that can satisfy the mole-balance constraints, subject to changes in analytical data that are within the specified uncertainty limits. The -minimal option limits the models to those sets of minerals for which no model can be found with a subset of that set of minerals. In genera
Related Questions
- Is there any way that I might form an output file which lists only the sum of residuals and maximum fractional error for each test run?
- I get the following error "Could not create output file (was replacing the original zip file)". What is wrong?
- What is the error: Could not write header for output file (incorrect codec parameters) ?
