Is there any independent source of information that reviews the newsletters?
We are not aware of any outside reviewer covering us at this time. Partly, this is because our public presence is relatively new. Also, the groups that track newsletters seem primarily interested in tracking newsletters composed of vague comments about the economy as a whole, (e.g., “The market seems bearish based on the President’s last speech.”) In order to get reviewed, we’d have to reduce the amount of information (and quality) in our newsletters in order to have a product that reviewing services know how to deal with. If anyone does claim to be providing an objective review of our newsletters, beware. We don’t currently have any reviewing services in our subscriber list, so anything claiming to be a review of us is produced without access to our newsletters.
