Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Is there any importance or relevancy in having .06% of a direct royal line in blood?

0
Posted

Is there any importance or relevancy in having .06% of a direct royal line in blood?

0

Having royal ancestry does not itself make you royalty. A large portion of the Anglo Saxon people of the American South have royal ancestry even those of humble means. Actually if you could go back far enough probably most everybody at some time had some royal ancestry. However, a person needs to make the connection by the 16th or 17th century in order to prove it. Once they make the connection, it opens the door to other royal ancestry. Without making the connection that soon it is hard to find the documentation. Some will make the claim that only people of upper class survived plagues and famines. I don’t buy that argument. When great calamities like that happened usually it meant only the fittest survived and they bred a tougher breed of people Look at what happened when those people were released from the sewers in France. Epidemics broke out all over France but those people who were born in those sewers were not effected. When the great potato famine hit Ireland in the 1840s most

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123