Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Is there any british or australian lawyer pls help me in writing a topic?

0
Posted

Is there any british or australian lawyer pls help me in writing a topic?

0

I don’t know about the Australian system, but in English criminal law, there are circumstances under which defendants’ previous convictions are admissible – in essence where previous convictions are relevant in that they show a propensity to commit offences of a particular kind, or a propensity to lie. That aside the reasons for not generally allowing previous convictions to be admissible are these: 1. A jury at a criminal trial in the modern era is responsible for deciding whether the defendant is guilty of offence with which he is charged – not to decide whether he is a criminal or generally a bad person. 2. Most previous convictions will not be relevant to the issue of guilt, but will be prejudicial. Jurors are not perfect and hearing that a defendant has previous convictions will tend to prejudice them against him – make them assume that he is of a criminal nature, or feel that he is deserving of punishment generally – without giving them any evidence about the current offence. 3.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123