Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Is there a trend or preference for more laymen vs. scientific terminology?

0
Posted

Is there a trend or preference for more laymen vs. scientific terminology?

0

Either. However, if abbreviations are being used then they must be standard/accepted abbreviations.

0

Either. However, if abbreviations are being used then they must be standard abbreviations which can be easily interpreted when under review.

0

Documentation should be quantitative data, such as measurements (how far did she walk, with or without devices) and qualitative (feeling better). Example 1: Patellar mobs X 10 min v.PT performed inferior patellar mobs X 10 min to facilitate knee flexion. Example 2:E-stim R quad x 20 min v.Muscle recruitment/ medial head/R quad is poor quality and delayed compared to L: Applied E-stim (note parameters)If abbreviations are being used then they must be standard abbreviations which can be easily interpreted when under review.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123