Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Is there a trade-off between fecundity and egg volume in the parasitic copepod Lernanthropus cynoscicola?

0
Posted

Is there a trade-off between fecundity and egg volume in the parasitic copepod Lernanthropus cynoscicola?

0

Negative relationships between egg number and egg size are commonly seen in many animal taxa, supporting the idea that there is a trade-off between egg number and egg size resulting from the allocation of resources to either one or the other. In parasites, where availability of resources is presumably very high, there may be fewer energetic constraints acting on allocation strategies, and the trade-off may be weakened. We investigated the association between egg number and egg volume among females of the copepod Lernanthropus cynoscicola Timi and Etchegoin, 1996, parasitic on the fish Cynoscion guatucupa (Cuvier). Both egg number and egg volume were strongly correlated with female body size. After controlling for the effects of body size, we found absolutely no evidence of a trade-off, i.e. no negative relationship, between egg number and egg volume. For a given body length, females that produce many eggs do not tend to produce relatively small eggs, and vice versa. In contrast, under

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123