Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Is there a “remote exploit” bug in Pines handling of mailcap entries?

bug entries handling mailcap Pine
0
Posted

Is there a “remote exploit” bug in Pines handling of mailcap entries?

0

Many people have inquired about a recent widely-distributed message describing a “remote exploit in pine,” specifically, a “vulnerability in the metamail package used with pine” and a claim that the “`” character “is incorrectly expanded by pine.” We believe the following to be true: • There is indeed a vulnerability in the default mailcap file distributed with the popular metamail MIME-support package. • This same mailcap file has in the past been included in Pine distributions as a sample; however, this sample file is not used by Pine unless it is manually installed and renamed. • While the metamail package can be used with Pine, Pine does not require the installation of metamail. • If a site chooses to install metamail, they should definitely expunge the dangerous entries from the default mailcap file. A corrected mailcap file is available. • If correcting the system mailcap file is not immediately possible, users may wish to set Pine’s “mailcap-search-path” variable to a personal m

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123