Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Is there a performance hit from using EMANATE as opposed to a monolithic agent?

0
0 Posted

Is there a performance hit from using EMANATE as opposed to a monolithic agent?

0
0

Of course, EMANATE imposes a small overhead for the Master Agent/Subagent communication. The performance is not affected dramatically. The round-trip time for sending an SNMP request between two workstations on SNMP Research’s network is between 6 and 12 ms. As disk access time is typically in this range as well, this is not considered problematic. Using SSL between the Master Agent and Subagents requires additional resources. Use only when necessary.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123