Is the work of the ant reviewed or evaluated?
As far as all activities of the ant are concerned, from the first year itself, we has set up a periodic system of review by all staff members of the organisation. Each member has to help evaluate the activity – like weaving or health or group work – on 5 parameters by allotting scores out of a maximum of 5 (lately revised to 6 to avoid midpoint bias) for each of the parameters. These are Effectivity, Efficiency (money, time, resources and emotional cost efficiency also) Community Participation, Sustainability and Gandhiji’s Talisman, the last one to assess the relevance of the programme to the poorest of our area. Every member of the ant also has to face an anonymous 360 degree evaluation by every member of the ant including one’s own self against 20 parameters. This evaluation is analysed on a percentile basis and upto 15% of one’s salary can be enhanced based on this. Besides funding agencies assess and review our progress while they giving or continuing grants to us. Formats for pro
As far as all activities of the ant are concerned, from the first year itself, we had set up a periodic system of review by all staff members of the organisation. Each member has to help evaluate the activity – like weaving or health or group work – on 5 parameters by allotting scores out of a maximum of 5 (lately revised to 6 to avoid midpoint bias) for each of the parameters. These are Effectivity, Efficiency (of money, time, resources and emotional cost efficiency also) Community Participation, Sustainability and Gandhiji’s Talisman, the last one to assess the relevance of the programme to the poorest of our area. Every member of the ant also has to face an anonymous 360 degree evaluation by every member of the ant including one’s own self against 25 parameters. Besides, a performance analysis has also been instituted to measure performance as the earlier evaluation was seen only as a quality evaluation. This evaluation is analysed on a percentile basis and upto one month a year of
