Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Is the Water Authoritys intent in specifying times for the inlet and outlet shafts to separate the work from that of the FRS II Contractor?

0
Posted

Is the Water Authoritys intent in specifying times for the inlet and outlet shafts to separate the work from that of the FRS II Contractor?

0

The intent is to facilitate coordination of activities with those of the FRS II contractor. 2008-06-19 Section 01002-1.02.Q.A. reads in part “the Pipeline 3 Relining Contractor will require a weight capacity of approximately 32000 lbs per axle”. Portobelo Road Access crosses the existing pipelines at approximate PB Access Rd stationing 10+50 north of the north portal. It also crosses the existing pipelines again at PB Access Rd stationing 26+00 and 37+00 south of the north portal between the north portal and the inlet shaft. We assume the crossing which needs to accommodate 32000 lbs per axle for the Pipeline Relining Contractor applies only to the crossing at 10+50 and not to the crossings at 26+00 and 37+00. Is this correct? Please clarify. Yes. 2008-06-19 Section 01010-1.04.F. reads the “Pipeline 3 Relining Contractor will not be granted access via Calle de Vida”. Section 01010-1.05.A.2 implies that Portobelo Drive will be for traffic less than 30 tons. Is the Pipeline 3 Relining Co

0

The intent is to facilitate coordination of activities with those of the FRS II contractor. 2008-06-19 Section 01002-1.02.Q.A. reads in part “the Pipeline 3 Relining Contractor will require a weight capacity of approximately 32000 lbs per axle”. Portobelo Road Access crosses the existing pipelines at approximate PB Access Rd stationing 10+50 north of the north portal. It also crosses the existing pipelines again at PB Access Rd stationing 26+00 and 37+00 south of the north portal between the north portal and the inlet shaft. We assume the crossing which needs to accommodate 32000 lbs per axle for the Pipeline Relining Contractor applies only to the crossing at 10+50 and not to the crossings at 26+00 and 37+00. Is this correct? Please clarify. Yes. 2008-06-19 Section 01010-1.04.F. reads the “Pipeline 3 Relining Contractor will not be granted access via Calle de Vida”. Section 01010-1.05.A.2 implies that Portobelo Drive will be for traffic less than 30 tons. Is the Pipeline 3 Relining Co

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123