Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Is the use of a Photocoagulator unsuitable for SLT?

0
Posted

Is the use of a Photocoagulator unsuitable for SLT?

0

If low energy is the key to preventing tissue damage, why not simply turn down the power on a standard continuous wave (cw) laser and achieve the same result. While the power can be reduced, the shortest pulse width for most laser photocoagulators is .01 seconds, compared to the 3 x 10-9 seconds for the SLT laser. The work of Jim Wise, M.D., (click here for Wise article PDF) who developed ALT, showed that to obtain a reliable pressure lowering effect it was necessary to utilize a high level of power and a small spot size. Normal parameters for ALT are 800 milliwatts for 0.1 seconds resulting in 80 millijoules being delivered in a 50 micron spot. This compares to typically less than 1 millijoule in a 400 micron spot for SLT. Simply turning down the power and reducing the exposure time on a photocoagulator results in no pressure lowering effect.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123