Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Is the theory that non-living things can create living things true or false?

0
Posted

Is the theory that non-living things can create living things true or false?

0

There weren’t always living things, yet there are living things now, so logically the theory must be true somewhere down the line. The word you are looking for is abiogenesis.

0
10

1) It depends on which theory we are speaking about. The old theory of spontaneous generation has been disproved. Because living things obviously exist and their existence does not seem possible at former stages of the evolution of the universe (Big Bang model), something of that kind must have happened. The scientific model for the origin of life assumes this. Also the possibility of extraterrestrial intelligence or extraterrestrial life assumes this. 2) “In the natural sciences, abiogenesis, or origin of life, is the study of how life on Earth began from inanimate matter. It should not be confused with evolution, which is the study of how living things have changed over time. Amino acids, often called “the building blocks of life”, occur naturally, due to chemical reactions unrelated to life. In all living things, these amino acids are organized into proteins, and the construction of these proteins is mediated by nucleic acids. Thus the question of the origin of life is a question of

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123