Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Is the solution to the “edge” phenomenon to increase the voltage a the time of acquisition so that the negative events are sufficiently far from the baseline to look “rounded” after transformation?

0
10 Posted

Is the solution to the “edge” phenomenon to increase the voltage a the time of acquisition so that the negative events are sufficiently far from the baseline to look “rounded” after transformation?

0
10

Yes, as long as you don’t push your positives off-scale. Q: The gates on templates created in previous versions (before the transformation feature was implemented) do not reflect the transformation. A: This problem isn’t a simple one and it only arises once: during the transition from not having the transformation (“old workspaces”) to now having it (“old workspaces where you specifically now tell it to transform”). Since it is an active process to transform old analyses, you need to check and adjust your gates.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123