Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Is the Remedy Worth The Administrative Headache?

0
Posted

Is the Remedy Worth The Administrative Headache?

0

On September 3, 2003, the IRS issued Revenue Ruling 2003-102 (the “Ruling”). The Ruling paves the way for employer sponsored health plans to reimburse many over the counter (OTC) drugs on a tax-free basis. Prior to the Ruling, many had interpreted applicable law to provide restrict tax-free reimbursement to drugs that could only be obtained with a prescription. Overall, the clarification that “eligible medical expense” under Section 213(d) includes OTC drugs is a good thing for both health plan participants and plan sponsors; however, the administrative complexities associated with processing OTC claims may be enough to force even the most tolerant claims adjudicator to reach for the aspirin, ibuprofen, or other OTC painkiller. We discuss below the scope of the Ruling, the administrative complexities associated with adjudicating OTC claims, and plan design considerations for plan sponsors.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123